An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It can be properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
It also addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and one hundred twenty with the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
Also, it may review an appeal of the decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts In the event the Commission cannot access a decision.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, These are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Most of the volumes (including more recent volumes than the library's holdings) also are available online through the Caselaw Access Project.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight provided to any reported judgment may well depend on the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[seven]
However it's made very clear that police is free to acquire action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also make certain regard of your family shed in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security on the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. nine. Contemplating the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been accomplished. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of your boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf in the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for just a dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Work opportunities with DCFS.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Consequently, this petition is admissible based on proven court precedents, and the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
Any court could search for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
eight. To the reasons stated over, this court finds the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is As a result acceded to. All pending applications, if any, here will also be dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.